🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just the winner overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes added after that and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which election day went somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously went for Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he does because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and residents all went for Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. But no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on if the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.