🔗 Share this article

Throughout last year's presidential campaign, the former president courted the electorate with pledges to lower costs starting on day one. But, once his inauguration, he seemed to pay precious little focus to the cost of living. This shifted after price-fatigued voters expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Within days, the Trump administration launched a hastily assembled campaign to address affordability. Unfortunately, the drive is a hot mess—filled with illogical claims, contradictions, magical thinking, blame-shifting, and misleading statements.

Detached Assertions and Grocery Store Truth

Merely 48 hours after the election, the president kicked off his affordability drive with a poorly received remark: “Food prices are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from the wealthy leader—who frequently associates with fellow billionaires—demonstrated a lack of empathy for millions of Americans who struggle every time they go the grocery store. Essentially, he dismissed their struggles as trivial, implying they had it wrong about price levels.

His assertion that everything was “way down” was highly misleading and inaccurate. How could all costs be falling when the taxes he imposed were pushing up prices? Official statistics show the cost of bananas rose nearly 7% in the last twelve months, beef prices went up almost 15%, and coffee prices surged 18.9%—partly because of punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. Between January and September, costs increased in five of the six main grocery groups tracked by the Consumer Price Index, including animal proteins (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (up 2.8%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Contradictions and Falsehoods in Financial Claims

In spite of these numbers, the president persists in repeating his misleading narrative about affordability. After the vote, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” declared “prices are way down,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” Such remarks contradict the reality that general costs have clearly increased after the previous administration. Currently, inflation is at a 3 percent per year, that’s 50% higher than the central bank’s 2% goal. In another falsehood, he claimed that fuel costs had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, even though official data indicate they are over three dollars.

Faced with reality and lower approval ratings, advisers apparently cautioned that his “prices are down” rhetoric portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. Many citizens are angry about prices continuing to climb after promises of reductions. In response, advisers proposed one quick fix: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. This sensible idea clashed with the president’s unrealistic claim that new tariffs would not increase costs for American shoppers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Possible Effects

With some tariffs reduced on several food items, Trump will probably announce that he has cut prices once these products start declining in price. This would be similar to a firestarter boasting for putting out a fire that he ignited. In another instance, when addressing McDonald’s executives, Trump stated that “we are in the golden age of America” and told listeners that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” These comments are easy for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans facing hardships—particularly when many risk losing food stamps or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a survey from October, 74% of Americans believe the state of the economy are fair or poor, while just a quarter rate them positive. Another poll showed that a majority of citizens feel Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Financial Reality and Proposed Steps

The treasury secretary, the president’s chief financial officer, recently disputed claims of a golden age. He stated that instead of thriving, certain sectors of the American economy “are in recession.” Industrial production—a priority for the administration—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and lost around 33,000 jobs this year. Citing this weakness, the secretary called on the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could help affordability.

In response to widespread concern about living costs, the president proposed a direct payment of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” not for “high income people.” To numerous households in need, this sounds like manna from heaven, but the prospects are dim that lawmakers—concerned about large shortfalls—will approve such a plan. This idea could raise government expenditure, push up borrowing costs, and potentially drive prices higher by putting more money into the economy.

A further supposed fix for affordability involved introducing 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that this would reduce monthly mortgage payments. But, the truth is that such lengthy loans would do little to reduce installments—often reducing them by a small amount each month. The downside is that these mortgages could significantly increase the overall cost borrowers pay and slow building home value.

Faulting the Past Government and Economic Prospects

In their cost-cutting effort, Trump and his team have once more blamed the previous president for financial challenges, such as rising prices. Spokespeople claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up the prior administration’s price hikes.” These are unfounded and inaccurate allegations. In reality, the former president left a robust economic situation, with low price growth, economic growth strong, and minimal joblessness. But, the current administration’s actions—especially his tariffs—have resulted in an difficult situation, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

Per Mark Zandi, lead analyst at a research firm, numerous regions are experiencing economic decline, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. He worries that if key regions like California and New York tumble into recession, the nation could face a widespread recession. In downturns, people generally possess less money to spend, and inflation often falls. Sadly, with Trump’s much-ballyhooed cost initiative likely to do little to hold down prices, his most effective “tool” for achieving increased affordability might end up pushing the nation into recession—something that struggling Americans cannot handle.